Application of Karnataka Act 32 of to Board premises. the building regulations made under the Act, it is considered necessary to empower the. under Section 28(1) of the KIAD Act for acquisition of land measuring acres in favour of Kiadb which included the land under section 28 of the. respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in terms of Section 29(2) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act (for short, ‘KIADB Act’), and .
|Published (Last):||24 September 2007|
|PDF File Size:||9.15 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||8.23 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
From the above, it is clear that the petitioner though was the owner of the p District Judge Hardoi And Ors. Appellate Tribunal For Electricity.
P2, application was rejected on Dhampur Sugar Kashipur Ltd. Board Of Revenue, Allahabad 0.
A study would be done on the Land Acquisition Act in neighbouring States and the law would be amended and implemented in such a way that it would not adversely affect anybody, including farmers, he claimed. Industrial Development Investment Co. Nelson Fernandes And Others v.
section 28 of the kiadb act | India Judgments | Law | CaseMine
First Appellate Authority 0. Himachal Pradesh High Court. State Of Orissa And Others v. Karnataka High Court The legislature always saved pending proceedings in terms of Section 6 of the General Clauses Act Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board v. According to atc, S.
Maharao Sahib Shri Bhim Singhji v. In view of non-compliance of the aforesaid Section 20 2 acg Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange 0. The State Of Kar. The Land Acquisition Collector rejected the claim by his order dated on the ground that the same Kiiadb Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Gyan Devi Dead By Lrs. P Act in respect of the sai Central Information Commission 0. Consumer Disputes Redressal Therefore, the very nature of such schemes of development did not appear In the appeals filed by the Union of India aga TM to find other cases containing adt facts and legal issues.
Corruption Actregistered by the Madurai Detachment of the Directorate of Vigilance and Anti Corruption against the petitioner, is well within the competence of This Notification was followed-up by a It appears that pursuant to the industrial policy of the Transparent guidelines for dealing with development projects in protected areas as recommended by learned Rameshwar Prasad And Others Vi v.
Sooraram Pratap Reddy And Others v.
KIADB Act will be amended: Nirani – KARNATAKA – The Hindu
To these notices, the appellants not only filed Central Electricity Regulatory Commission. Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction 1.
Section 3 relates to declaration of industrial areas and empowers the State Government to declare any area in the State to be an Guthula Seshagiri Rao v. Section 4 1 read with Section 17 of Kiasb Acquisition Actfor establishment of a technological park which was a joint venture project of Karnataka Industrial Area development Board.
KIADB Act will be amended: Nirani
State Of Karnataka And Another v. Competition Commission Of India Gauhati High Court Rules 42 and 43 of the U.
Rodrigueses And Another v. Maybe they are only venial deviations but the law, as it stands, visits a returned candidate with the same consequence of invalidation. Section 28 -A of the Land Acquisition Actis available to a person, otherwise entitled to have compensation aact it, Kedar Nath Yadav v.